Q8 — Waltz Line Labeling
A six-junction drawing with a cross-connector — the propagation wipes out to NIL.
The Question
Same junction dictionary (L1–L6, W1–W3, Y1–Y3, T1–T4, rotations allowed). A six-junction drawing to label.
3 --------- 4 --------- 5
| \ / | |
| \ / | |
| \ / | |
| 1 | |
| / \ | |
| / \ | |
| / \ | |
2 --------- 6 -----------
Official answer: NIL
The Topic in 60 Seconds
Each junction must realize one legal dictionary pattern; shared edges agree at both ends. Empty domain ⇒ NIL.
Deep-dive: Waltz Line Labeling.
Step 0 — Count edges per junction
| Junction | Incident edges | Degree | Legal types |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3 | 4, 2, 1 | 3 | W / Y / T |
| 4 | 3, 5, 1 | 3 | T (collinear bar 3-4-5 + stem) |
| 5 | 4, 6 | 2 | L |
| 1 | 3, 4, 2, 6 | 4 | none |
| 2 | 3, 1, 6 | 3 | W / Y / T |
| 6 | 5, 2, 1 | 3 | W / Y / T |
The dictionary only contains L (2 edges), T/W/Y (3 edges each). Junction 1 has a fourth spoke: the drawing connects it to 3 and 4 (upper diagonals) and to 2 and 6 (lower diagonals).
Why the answer is NIL
- A CSP assignment needs a dictionary pattern for every junction. Junction 1's domain starts empty: no L, W, Y or T pattern has four incident edges, no rotation fixes that, and no neighbor can remove an edge for it.
- Propagation never even gets a chance — the wipe-out is at the initial domain, not mid-search. Every other junction could label fine (T4 would fire its two outward bar arrows on 3-4 and 4-5, the L at 5 takes a matching arrow), but one unassignable junction makes the whole labeling inconsistent.
- So the drawing cannot come from a trihedral scene →
NIL✓
Exam takeaway: before propagating anything, count edges at every junction. A 4-edge fan is an instant NIL.
Interactive check
1 / 3
Degrees from the figure:
J3=3, J4=3 (T), J5=2 (L), J2=3, J6=3
J1 = 4 edges (!)
assignable junctionbeing checkedempty domainlabeled
Tricks & Tips
Answer: 8.1 NIL